PENERAPAN KETERAMPILAN METAKOGNITIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KESADARAN BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR

Nita Dwi Andayani
Toto Nusantara
Riska Pristiani
Ade Eka Anggraini
Siti Faizah


DOI: https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v11i2.7796

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi kontribusi keterampilan metakognitif dalam membangun kesadaran belajar siswa sejak jenjang sekolah dasar. Fokus kajian mencakup tiga komponen utama metakognisi, yakni perencanaan, pemantauan (monitoring), dan evaluasi. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif, dengan instrumen berupa rubrik penilaian aktivitas metakognisi yang telah disesuaikan dengan standar penilaian terbaru. Data diperoleh dari 20 peserta didik kelas IV sekolah dasar. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa 65% siswa berada pada kategori sedang dalam aspek perencanaan, 58% berada dalam kategori tinggi untuk monitoring, dan 52% menunjukkan tingkat sedang pada evaluasi. Temuan ini mencerminkan bahwa kemampuan siswa dalam memantau proses belajar sudah cukup baik, namun aspek perencanaan dan evaluasi masih memerlukan penguatan. Lebih lanjut, siswa yang memiliki keterampilan metakognitif yang baik umumnya menunjukkan performa akademik yang lebih unggul serta mampu menentukan strategi belajar yang tepat. Dengan demikian, pengintegrasian pelatihan keterampilan metakognitif ke dalam proses pembelajaran menjadi hal yang krusial untuk membentuk kesadaran belajar siswa secara bertahap dan terstruktur sejak dini.

Keywords


metakognisi; kesadaran belajar; perencanaan; monitoring; evaluasi

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics :

References


Baker, L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of Reading Research.

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (2016). Metacognitive skills and reading. In Handbook of Reading Research.

Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2016). Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In Handbook of Epistemic Cognition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795225

Betris Susi Yanti Simbolon, & Dorlan Naibaho. (2023). Merencanakan Strategi Dan Metode Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Magistra, 2(1 SE-Articles), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.62200/magistra.v2i1.73

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Metacognition, motivation, and understanding.

Cahyani, L. N., Shodiq, L. J., & Agustin, D. R. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Memecahkan Soal TIMMS Konten Aljabar Ditinjau dari Pengetahuan Metakognitif. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M). https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v5i1.646

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,dan Mixed (Edisi Ketiga). Pustaka Pelajar.

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies. In Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

Efklides, A. (2019). Gifted students and self-regulated learning: The MASRL model and its implications for SRL. High Ability Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1556069

Efklides, A., & Schwartz, B. L. (2024). Revisiting the Metacognitive and Affective Model of Self-Regulated Learning: Origins, Development, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09896-9

Faiziyah, N., & Priyambodho, B. L. (2022). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS DITINJAU DARI METAKOGNISI SISWA. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5918

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. In Statistics.

Flavell, J. H. (1979a). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Flavell, J. H. (1979b). Theories of learning in educational psychology: Metacognition theory. The Nature of Intelligence.

Gemnafle, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2021). Manajemen Pembelajaran. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN PROFESI GURU INDONESIA (JPPGI). https://doi.org/10.30598/jppgivol1issue1page28-42

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step-by-Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 14.0 update (7th Edition). Http://Lst-Iiep.Iiep-Unesco.Org/Cgi-Bin/Wwwi32.Exe/[In=epidoc1.in]/?T2000=026564/(100).

Hidayanti, R., Nurdin, N., & Fajar, F. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV) Ditinjau dari Kesadaran Metakognisi. Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED). https://doi.org/10.35580/imed11049

Linse, C. T. (2006). Practical English Language Teaching: English for Young Learners. In Language.

OECD. (2019). Conceptual learning framework, Attitudes and values for 2030. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030.

OECD. (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en. In Oecd.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. In Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicologia. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221

Panadero, E., & Broadbent, J. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: A self-regulated learning perspective. In Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109251

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation. In Enabling Power of Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18

Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. In Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416

Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (2003). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Preparing Teachers to Use Contextual Teaching and Learning Strategies to Improve Student Success in and beyond School.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Safitri, P. T., Yasintasari, E., Putri, S. A., & Hasanah, U. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Model PISA. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i1.941

Sari, M., Rachman, H., Juli Astuti, N., Win Afgani, M., & Abdullah Siroj, R. (2022). Explanatory Survey dalam Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1953

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Siolimbona, D., Juniati, D., & Khabibah, S. (2023). Studi Literatur Proses Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath : Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.25139/smj.v11i1.5618

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012), h. 117. Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi Farmasyifa.

Teng, F. (2021). Metacognitive strategies in mediating EFL adult learners’ self-regulated language learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 692360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692360

Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4

Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading, and writing in English as a foreign language: Evidence from longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413

Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. In American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Risks Report 2020 - Reports - World Economic Forum. World Economic Forum.

Zepeda, C. D., Elizabeth Richey, J., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022

Zepeda, C. D., Martin, R. S., & Butler, A. C. (2020). Motivational Strategies to Engage Learners in Desirable Difficulties. In Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.007

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. In Theory into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2